What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

4S The AurrumConscient Elevate
Asking rate₹22,017
per super sq ft
≈ ₹33,872 per carpet
one listing
₹45,790
per super sq ft
≈ ₹70,446 per carpet
one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft₹42,698a modelled rate card₹84,024a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published₹5.30 Cr – ₹7.84 Cr₹3.91 Cr – ₹12.14 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here₹7.17 Cr – ₹7.84 Cr
3,257–3,562 sq ft super
≈ 2,117–2,315 sq ft carpet
2 listed
₹5.13 Cr – ₹12.14 Cr
1,855–2,650 sq ft super
≈ 1,206–1,722 sq ft carpet
4 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes₹5,006 above
the median of 41 comparable homes
our cohort
₹16,529 above
the median of 25 comparable homes
our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

4S The AurrumConscient Elevate
RegistrationRERA-GRG-1572-2024hrera registerRERA-GRG-120-2018hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until31/10/2029registration up-to31/12/2024
past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself
contradiction on record
Stage and possessionNew Launch
possession stated as 2030-10
as listed
Ready To Move
possession stated as 2024-12
as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

4S The AurrumConscient Elevate
Developer4S Developers
1 projects we track, 4 town-planning licences
tcp rolls
Conscient Infrastructure
8 projects we track, 3 town-planning licences
tcp rolls
Sizenot on recordnot on record
Amenities10 counted
5 of them premium
as listed
53 counted
39 of them premium
as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro4.1 kmstraight-line2.3 kmnamed station
Resale outlookHard to resell
how contested selling it again would be
our index
Hard to resell
how contested selling it again would be
our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On 4S The Aurrum

What residents of this locality complain about
not on record

On Conscient Elevate

What residents of this locality complain about
not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.
Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.

Keep going

Both reports, and the sector behind them