Sector 89 A, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| ATS Marigold | Vatika Seven Elements | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹12,279 per super sq ft ≈ ₹18,891 per carpet one listing | ₹11,816 per super sq ft ≈ ₹18,178 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹25,769a modelled rate card | ₹24,963a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹2.15 Cr – ₹3.25 Cr | ₹2.53 Cr – ₹3.64 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹2.15 Cr – ₹3.25 Cr 1,750–2,650 sq ft super ≈ 1,138–1,722 sq ft carpet 3 listed | ₹2.53 Cr – ₹2.83 Cr 1,970–3,362 sq ft super ≈ 1,280–2,185 sq ft carpet 2 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹1,987 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹827 above the median of 10 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| ATS Marigold | Vatika Seven Elements | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-345-2019hrera register | RERA-GRG-460-2019hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 28/02/2027registration up-to | 30/01/2030registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2024-02 as listed | Under Constructionas listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | their own filed completion date has moved back 42 months filed 2019-12-24 form rep-i | not on record |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| ATS Marigold | Vatika Seven Elements | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ATS Group 7 projects we track our corpus | Vatika Limited 20 projects we track, 26 town-planning licences, 7 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 35 counted 21 of them premium as listed | 46 counted 33 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 12.8 kmstraight-line | 18.1 kmnamed station |
| Resale outlook | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On ATS Marigold
On Vatika Seven Elements
The part you were expecting
Keep going