Sector 66, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| BPTP Mansions Park Prime | Emaar MGF Palm Terraces | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹14,834 per super sq ft ≈ ₹22,821 per carpet one listing | ₹21,429 per super sq ft ≈ ₹32,967 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹30,210a modelled rate card | ₹41,673a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹3.90 Cr – ₹4.65 Cr | ₹4.50 Cr – ₹4.50 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹3.90 Cr – ₹4.65 Cr 2,764–3,644 sq ft super ≈ 1,797–2,369 sq ft carpet | ₹4.50 Cr 2,100 sq ft super ≈ 1,365 sq ft carpet 1 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹2,171 below the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort | ₹4,424 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| BPTP Mansions Park Prime | Emaar MGF Palm Terraces | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2017-12 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2016-04 as listed |
The building and the developer
| BPTP Mansions Park Prime | Emaar MGF Palm Terraces | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | BPTP Limited 17 projects we track our corpus | Emaar India 31 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 15 counted 8 of them premium as listed | 37 counted 28 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 6.6 kmstraight-line | 6.2 kmnamed station |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On BPTP Mansions Park Prime
On Emaar MGF Palm Terraces
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two