Sector 92, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| GLS South Avenue | ROF Amaltas | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹6,752 per super sq ft ≈ ₹10,388 per carpet one listing | ₹8,362 per super sq ft ≈ ₹12,865 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹16,160a modelled rate card | ₹18,959a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹59.50 L – ₹75.00 L | ₹46.00 L – ₹70.00 L |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 2 BHK here | ₹59.50 L – ₹75.00 L 562–623 sq ft super ≈ 365–405 sq ft carpet | ₹70.00 L 989 sq ft super ≈ 643 sq ft carpet 1 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹1,190 below the median of 22 comparable homes our cohort | ₹1,288 above the median of 22 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| GLS South Avenue | ROF Amaltas | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-707-2020hrera register | RERA-GRG-227-2019hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 31/08/2024 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | 27/02/2024 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2024-09 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2024-02 as listed |
The building and the developer
| GLS South Avenue | ROF Amaltas | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | GLS Infraprojects 5 projects we track, 9 town-planning licences tcp rolls | ROF Group 8 projects we track our corpus |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 16 counted 7 of them premium as listed | 40 counted 26 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 2.6 kmstraight-line | 1.2 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Easy to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On GLS South Avenue
On ROF Amaltas
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two