Sector 88A, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Godrej Oasis | ROF Pravasa | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹10,095 per super sq ft ≈ ₹15,530 per carpet one listing | ₹8,442 per super sq ft ≈ ₹12,987 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹21,972a modelled rate card | ₹19,098a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹1.40 Cr – ₹2.80 Cr | ₹2.40 Cr – ₹2.40 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹1.75 Cr – ₹2.80 Cr 1,616–2,872 sq ft super ≈ 1,050–1,867 sq ft carpet | ₹2.40 Cr 2,843 sq ft super ≈ 1,848 sq ft carpet 1 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹1,127 below the median of 37 comparable homes our cohort | ₹686 above the median of 8 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Godrej Oasis | ROF Pravasa | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-628-2020hrera register | RERA-GRG-1775-2024hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 30/09/2019 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | 30/04/2030registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2019-09 as listed | New Launch possession stated as 2028-04 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | 83% of 311 units booked filed 2020-07-05 form rep-i | not on record |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| Godrej Oasis | ROF Pravasa | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Godrej Properties 18 projects we track, 3 town-planning licences tcp rolls | ROF Group 8 projects we track our corpus |
| Size | not on record | 816 homesas listed |
| Amenities | 31 counted 21 of them premium as listed | 22 counted 14 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 12.5 kmstraight-line | 12.1 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Godrej Oasis
On ROF Pravasa
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two