Sector 103, Gurugram

AIPL The Riviera vs Godrej Vrikshya

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

AIPL The Riviera

AIPL

₹3.52 Cr

The full report on this one →

Godrej Vrikshya

Godrej Properties

₹3.31 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 103; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 4 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹3.52 Cr–₹5.12 Cr and ₹3.31 Cr–₹6.29 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	AIPL The Riviera	Godrej Vrikshya
Asking rate	₹16,000 per super sq ft ≈ ₹24,615 per carpet one listing	₹15,178 per super sq ft ≈ ₹23,351 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹32,237a modelled rate card	₹30,808a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹3.52 Cr – ₹5.12 Cr	₹3.31 Cr – ₹6.29 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here	₹5.12 Cr 3,200 sq ft super ≈ 2,080 sq ft carpet	₹6.29 Cr 3,700 sq ft super ≈ 2,405 sq ft carpet 1 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹1,010 below the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort	₹1,832 below the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	AIPL The Riviera	Godrej Vrikshya
Registration	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found	RERA-GRG-1650-2024hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	not on record	30/06/2031registration up-to
Stage and possession	Newlaunch possession stated as 2030-10 as listed	Under Construction possession stated as 2031-06 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	AIPL The Riviera	Godrej Vrikshya
Developer	AIPL 7 projects we track our corpus	Godrej Properties 18 projects we track, 3 town-planning licences tcp rolls
Size	344 homes across 2 towers as listed	not on record
Amenities	6 countedas listed	45 counted 30 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	8.9 kmstraight-line	9.9 kmstraight-line
Resale outlook	Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index	Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
AIPL The Riviera asks 5% more per square foot than Godrej Vrikshya — ₹16,000 against ₹15,178, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹1,429 a carpet square foot, against ₹822 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
✓
Possession is stated as 2030-10 for AIPL The Riviera and 2031-06 for Godrej Vrikshya
as listed by the developer
⚠
Godrej Vrikshya is matched to the Haryana RERA register; AIPL The Riviera is not. A project can be registered under a legal name that differs from its marketing name, so treat this as an open question on AIPL The Riviera rather than a finding
HRERA register
⚠
Godrej Vrikshya lists 45 amenities against 6 at AIPL The Riviera. It is a count of what is advertised, and nobody audits it
developer listings
⚠
Our resale index reads AIPL The Riviera as slower to resell and Godrej Vrikshya as hard to resell. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On AIPL The Riviera

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.