What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

ATS TriumphLevante Residences
Asking rate₹13,177
per super sq ft
≈ ₹20,273 per carpet
one listing
₹15,003
per super sq ft
≈ ₹23,081 per carpet
one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft₹27,329a modelled rate card₹30,503a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published₹3.88 Cr – ₹6.30 Cr₹3.41 Cr – ₹5.12 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here₹3.88 Cr – ₹6.30 Cr
3,150–4,781 sq ft super
≈ 2,048–3,108 sq ft carpet
2 listed
2,653–2,656 sq ft super
≈ 1,724–1,726 sq ft carpet
3 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes₹3,827 below
the median of 104 comparable homes
our cohort
₹2,007 below
the median of 41 comparable homes
our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

ATS TriumphLevante Residences
RegistrationRERA-GRG-2073-2025hrera registerRERA-GRG-2027-2025hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until15/12/2028registration up-to31/03/2032registration up-to
Stage and possessionReady To Move
possession stated as 2018-06
as listed
New Launch
possession stated as 2032-03
as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

ATS TriumphLevante Residences
DeveloperATS Group
7 projects we track
our corpus
Satya Group
4 projects we track, 1 town-planning licences
tcp rolls
Sizenot on recordnot on record
Amenities52 counted
34 of them premium
as listed
64 counted
44 of them premium
as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro12.2 kmnamed station10.1 kmnamed station
Resale outlookHard to resell
how contested selling it again would be
our index
Slower to resell
how contested selling it again would be
our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On ATS Triumph

What residents of this locality complain about
not on record
A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer
not on record

On Levante Residences

What residents of this locality complain about
not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.
Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.

Keep going

Both reports, and the sector behind them

Other comparisons with these two