Sector 63A, Gurugram

Concient 63A vs Godrej Verano

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

Concient 63A

Conscient

₹7.10 Cr

The full report on this one →

Godrej Verano

Godrej Properties

₹5.91 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 63A; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 4 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹7.10 Cr–₹10.00 Cr and ₹5.91 Cr–₹10.72 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	Concient 63A	Godrej Verano
Asking rate	₹24,333 per super sq ft ≈ ₹37,436 per carpet one listing	₹27,490 per super sq ft ≈ ₹42,292 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹46,725a modelled rate card	₹52,210a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹7.10 Cr – ₹10.00 Cr	₹5.91 Cr – ₹10.72 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here	₹10.00 Cr 4,000 sq ft super ≈ 2,600 sq ft carpet	₹8.11 Cr 2,950 sq ft super ≈ 1,918 sq ft carpet
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹7,323 above the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort	₹3,688 below the median of 19 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	Concient 63A	Godrej Verano
Registration	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found	RERA-GRG-2274-2026hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	not on record	02/06/2033registration up-to
Stage and possession	Upcomingas listed	Upcoming possession stated as 2032-12 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	Concient 63A	Godrej Verano
Developer	Conscient 8 projects we track, 3 town-planning licences tcp rolls	Godrej Properties 18 projects we track, 3 town-planning licences tcp rolls
Size	244 homes across 4 towers as listed	624 homes across 4 towers as listed
Amenities	not on record	8 countedas listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	5.2 kmstraight-line	5.2 kmstraight-line
Resale outlook	Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index	Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
Godrej Verano asks 13% more per square foot than Concient 63A — ₹27,490 against ₹24,333, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹5,485 a carpet square foot, against ₹3,156 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
⚠
Godrej Verano is matched to the Haryana RERA register; Concient 63A is not. A project can be registered under a legal name that differs from its marketing name, so treat this as an open question on Concient 63A rather than a finding
HRERA register
⚠
Our resale index reads Concient 63A as hard to resell and Godrej Verano as good resale market. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On Concient 63A

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.