Sector 76, Gurugram

Corona Gracieux vs Ninex City

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

Corona Gracieux

₹1.55 Cr

The full report on this one →

Ninex City

Ninex Group of Companies

₹1.76 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 76; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 4 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹1.55 Cr–₹3.45 Cr and ₹1.76 Cr–₹4.82 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	Corona Gracieux	Ninex City
Asking rate	₹12,000 per super sq ft ≈ ₹18,462 per carpet one listing	₹9,297 per super sq ft ≈ ₹14,303 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹25,283a modelled rate card	₹20,585a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹1.55 Cr – ₹3.45 Cr	₹1.76 Cr – ₹4.82 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here	₹3.05 Cr – ₹3.45 Cr 2,650 sq ft super ≈ 1,722 sq ft carpet	₹3.35 Cr 3,600 sq ft super ≈ 2,340 sq ft carpet 1 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹1,708 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort	₹995 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	Corona Gracieux	Ninex City
Registration	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	not on record	not on record
Stage and possession	Ready To Move possession stated as 2016-11 as listed	Ready To Move possession stated as 2018-01 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	Corona Gracieux	Ninex City
Developer	Not named the listing does not say who is building it not on record	Ninex Group of Companies 1 projects we track our corpus
Size	not on record	not on record
Amenities	28 counted 22 of them premium as listed	30 counted 22 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	12.2 kmnamed station	10.8 kmstraight-line
Resale outlook	Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index	Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
Corona Gracieux asks 29% more per square foot than Ninex City — ₹12,000 against ₹9,297, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹4,698 a carpet square foot, against ₹2,703 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
✓
Possession is stated as 2016-11 for Corona Gracieux and 2018-01 for Ninex City
as listed by the developer
✓
Ninex City is 1.4 km closer to a metro station (10.8 km against 12.2 km)
mapped station locations
⚠
Our resale index reads Corona Gracieux as slower to resell and Ninex City as mixed resale market. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On Corona Gracieux

What residents of this locality complain about

not on record

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer

not on record

On Ninex City

What residents of this locality complain about

not on record

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.

Corona Gracieux vs Ninex City

The money, side by side

Registration and delivery

What stands behind each one

Where they genuinely differ

Where the record is incomplete

We are not going to pick one

Both reports, and the sector behind them

Ask Trusite