Sector 76, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Ninex City | Whiteland Blissville | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹9,297 per super sq ft ≈ ₹14,303 per carpet one listing | ₹15,609 per super sq ft ≈ ₹24,014 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹20,585a modelled rate card | ₹31,557a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹1.76 Cr – ₹4.82 Cr | ₹2.05 Cr – ₹2.61 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹1.76 Cr – ₹2.27 Cr 1,952–2,370 sq ft super ≈ 1,269–1,540 sq ft carpet 2 listed | ₹2.05 Cr – ₹2.61 Cr 1,311–1,672 sq ft super ≈ 852–1,087 sq ft carpet 5 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹995 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹1,401 below the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Ninex City | Whiteland Blissville | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | RERA-GRG-1117-2022hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | 30/06/2027registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2018-01 as listed | Under Construction possession stated as 2026-12 as listed |
The building and the developer
| Ninex City | Whiteland Blissville | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ninex Group of Companies 1 projects we track our corpus | Whiteland Corporation 5 projects we track, 9 town-planning licences tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | 555 homesas listed |
| Amenities | 30 counted 22 of them premium as listed | 10 counted 5 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 10.8 kmstraight-line | 10.8 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Ninex City
On Whiteland Blissville
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two