Sector 65, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Emaar Emerald Hills | M3M Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹20,190 per super sq ft ≈ ₹31,061 per carpet one listing | ₹20,377 per super sq ft ≈ ₹31,349 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹39,520a modelled rate card | ₹39,846a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹2.00 Cr – ₹9.09 Cr | ₹2.50 Cr – ₹4.09 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 2 BHK here | ₹2.00 Cr – ₹2.42 Cr 990–1,200 sq ft super ≈ 644–780 sq ft carpet 2 listed | ₹2.50 Cr – ₹2.96 Cr 1,250–1,450 sq ft super ≈ 812–942 sq ft carpet 8 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹3,186 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort | ₹3,373 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Emaar Emerald Hills | M3M Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-643-2020hrera register | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 28/02/2030registration up-to | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2022-08 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2024-05 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | 91% of 823 units booked filed 2020-03-11 form rep-i | not on record |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| Emaar Emerald Hills | M3M Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Emaar India 31 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences tcp rolls | M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 45 counted 34 of them premium as listed | 48 counted 35 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 10.7 kmnamed station | 5.0 kmnamed station |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On M3M Heights
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two