Sector 70, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| GPL Eden Heights | Shree Vardhman Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹12,885 per super sq ft ≈ ₹19,824 per carpet one listing | ₹13,162 per super sq ft ≈ ₹20,249 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹26,822a modelled rate card | ₹27,303a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹1.59 Cr – ₹3.10 Cr | ₹1.75 Cr – ₹2.63 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹2.55 Cr – ₹3.10 Cr 2,150–2,190 sq ft super ≈ 1,398–1,424 sq ft carpet | ₹2.63 Cr 1,786 sq ft super ≈ 1,161 sq ft carpet 1 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹2,593 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹3,843 below the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| GPL Eden Heights | Shree Vardhman Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | RERA-GRG-923-2021hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | 31/12/2020 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2014-08 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2020-12 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | not on record | 100% of 592 units booked their own filed completion date has moved back 20 months filed 2021-08-31 form rep-i |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| GPL Eden Heights | Shree Vardhman Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | GPL 1 projects we track our corpus | Shree Vardhman Group 5 projects we track, 2 town-planning licences, 1 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 29 counted 20 of them premium as listed | 49 counted 36 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 8.9 kmstraight-line | 9.0 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On GPL Eden Heights
On Shree Vardhman Victoria
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two