Sector 89, Gurugram

Greenopolis vs Tulip Ace

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

Greenopolis

Orris Developers

₹1.17 Cr

The full report on this one →

Tulip Ace

Tulip Infratech

₹2.00 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 89; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 4 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹1.17 Cr–₹2.61 Cr and ₹2.00 Cr–₹3.50 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	Greenopolis	Tulip Ace
Asking rate	₹9,491 per super sq ft ≈ ₹14,601 per carpet one listing	₹9,826 per super sq ft ≈ ₹15,117 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹20,921a modelled rate card	₹21,503a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹1.17 Cr – ₹2.61 Cr	₹2.00 Cr – ₹3.50 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here	₹2.61 Cr 2,750 sq ft super ≈ 1,788 sq ft carpet 2 listed	₹2.80 Cr – ₹3.30 Cr 3,030 sq ft super ≈ 1,970 sq ft carpet
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹801 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort	Level with it within ₹500 of the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	Greenopolis	Tulip Ace
Registration	RERA-GRG-165-2019hrera register	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	31/12/2020flagged lapsed	not on record
Stage and possession	Ready To Move possession stated as 2015-12 as listed	Ready To Move possession stated as 2014-09 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	Greenopolis	Tulip Ace
Developer	Orris Developers 5 projects we track, 6 town-planning licences, 23 refused applications tcp rolls	Tulip Infratech 13 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences, 5 refused applications tcp rolls
Size	not on record	not on record
Amenities	42 counted 32 of them premium as listed	38 counted 30 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	13.3 kmstraight-line	13.2 kmstraight-line
Resale outlook	Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index	Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
Tulip Ace asks 4% more per square foot than Greenopolis — ₹9,826 against ₹9,491, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹582 a carpet square foot, against ₹335 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
✓
Possession is stated as 2015-12 for Greenopolis and 2014-09 for Tulip Ace
as listed by the developer
⚠
Greenopolis is matched to the Haryana RERA register; Tulip Ace is not. A project can be registered under a legal name that differs from its marketing name, so treat this as an open question on Tulip Ace rather than a finding
HRERA register
⚠
Our resale index reads Greenopolis as slower to resell and Tulip Ace as mixed resale market. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On Tulip Ace

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.