Sector 36A, Gurugram

Krisumi Waterside Residences vs Max Estate 360

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

Krisumi Waterside Residences

Krisumi Corporation Pvt Ltd

₹4.44 Cr

The full report on this one →

Max Estate 360

Max Estates

₹5.50 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 36A; both quoted on carpet area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 3 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹4.44 Cr–₹18.12 Cr and ₹5.50 Cr–₹7.44 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	Krisumi Waterside Residences	Max Estate 360
Asking rate	₹30,123–₹43,636 per super sq ft — sources disagree contested	₹25,455 per super sq ft ≈ ₹39,162 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹56,826a modelled rate card	₹48,676a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹4.44 Cr – ₹18.12 Cr	₹5.50 Cr – ₹7.44 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 3 BHK here	₹5.76 Cr – ₹6.89 Cr 1,912–2,284 sq ft super ≈ 1,243–1,485 sq ft carpet 2 listed	₹5.50 Cr – ₹5.99 Cr 2,160–2,354 sq ft super ≈ 1,404–1,530 sq ft carpet 3 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	No answer our two sources put it on opposite sides of the median contested	₹5,396 above the median of 48 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	Krisumi Waterside Residences	Max Estate 360
Registration	RERA-GRG-1562-2024hrera register	RERA-GRG-1675-2024hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	14/10/2029registration up-to	31/08/2030registration up-to
Stage and possession	Under Construction possession stated as 2029-10 as listed	Under Construction possession stated as 2030-08 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	Krisumi Waterside Residences	Max Estate 360
Developer	Krisumi Corporation Pvt Ltd 4 projects we track, 4 town-planning licences tcp rolls	Max Estates 4 projects we track our corpus
Size	1,004 homes across 3 towers as listed	not on record
Amenities	24 counted 18 of them premium as listed	58 counted 42 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	10.7 kmstraight-line	11.4 kmstraight-line
Resale outlook	Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index	Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
Krisumi Waterside Residences asks 18% more per square foot than Max Estate 360 — ₹30,144 against ₹25,455, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹8,150 a carpet square foot, against ₹4,688 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
✓
Possession is stated as 2029-10 for Krisumi Waterside Residences and 2030-08 for Max Estate 360
as listed by the developer
⚠
Max Estate 360 lists 58 amenities against 24 at Krisumi Waterside Residences. It is a count of what is advertised, and nobody audits it
developer listings
⚠
Our resale index reads Krisumi Waterside Residences as hard to resell and Max Estate 360 as mixed resale market. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On Krisumi Waterside Residences

What residents of this locality complain about

not on record

On Max Estate 360

What residents of this locality complain about

not on record

A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.

Krisumi Waterside Residences vs Max Estate 360

The money, side by side

Registration and delivery

What stands behind each one

Where they genuinely differ

Where the record is incomplete

We are not going to pick one

Both reports, and the sector behind them

Ask Trusite