Sector 68, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| M3M Flora | M3M Sierra 68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹13,814 per super sq ft ≈ ₹21,253 per carpet one listing | ₹11,926 per super sq ft ≈ ₹18,348 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹28,438a modelled rate card | ₹25,154a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹1.65 Cr – ₹2.55 Cr | ₹1.40 Cr – ₹1.90 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹2.20 Cr – ₹2.55 Cr 1,635 sq ft super ≈ 1,063 sq ft carpet | ₹1.67 Cr – ₹1.78 Cr 1,478 sq ft super ≈ 961 sq ft carpet |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹3,190 below the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort | ₹1,634 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| M3M Flora | M3M Sierra 68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-878-2021hrera register | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 31/07/2024 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2022-03 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2022-01 as listed |
The building and the developer
| M3M Flora | M3M Sierra 68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls | M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 6 counted 3 of them premium as listed | 35 counted 26 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 0.8 kmstraight-line | 8.0 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On M3M Flora
On M3M Sierra 68
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two