Sector 65, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| M3M Skycity | Prime Residences | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹13,459 per super sq ft ≈ ₹20,706 per carpet one listing | ₹17,513 per super sq ft ≈ ₹26,944 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹27,819a modelled rate card | ₹34,868a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹2.54 Cr – ₹4.25 Cr | ₹3.50 Cr – ₹3.50 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹3.25 Cr – ₹4.25 Cr 1,828–2,054 sq ft super ≈ 1,188–1,335 sq ft carpet | ₹3.50 Cr 1,998 sq ft super ≈ 1,299 sq ft carpet 2 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹4,048 above the median of 37 comparable homes our cohort | ₹6,822 below the median of 48 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| M3M Skycity | Prime Residences | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-1284-2023 matched on name similarity; unconfirmed unconfirmed match | RERA-GRG-1750-2024hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 01/05/2025 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | 30/12/2029registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2024-04 as listed | Under Construction possession stated as 2029-12 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | 92% of 2369 units booked filed 2023-01-23 form rep-i | not on record |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| M3M Skycity | Prime Residences | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls | Prime developement 1 projects we track our corpus |
| Size | not on record | 236 homesas listed |
| Amenities | 49 counted 37 of them premium as listed | 30 counted 21 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 7.7 kmnamed station | 5.7 kmnamed station |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Easy to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Prime Residences
The part you were expecting
Keep going