Sector 85, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Orris Aster Court | Orris Carnation Residency | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹8,509 per super sq ft ≈ ₹13,091 per carpet one listing | ₹9,415 per super sq ft ≈ ₹14,485 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹19,214a modelled rate card | ₹20,789a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹1.15 Cr – ₹1.60 Cr | ₹1.01 Cr – ₹1.86 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹1.60 Cr 1,952 sq ft super ≈ 1,269 sq ft carpet | ₹1.79 Cr – ₹1.86 Cr 1,900–1,975 sq ft super ≈ 1,235–1,284 sq ft carpet 2 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹1,783 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹877 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Orris Aster Court | Orris Carnation Residency | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2015-12 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2014-06 as listed |
The building and the developer
| Orris Aster Court | Orris Carnation Residency | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Orris Developers 5 projects we track, 6 town-planning licences, 23 refused applications tcp rolls | Orris Developers 5 projects we track, 6 town-planning licences, 23 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 30 counted 22 of them premium as listed | 34 counted 25 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 13.1 kmstraight-line | 13.4 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Orris Aster Court
On Orris Carnation Residency
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two