Sector 92, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Raheja Navodaya | Wal Pravah Senior Living | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹7,343 per super sq ft ≈ ₹11,297 per carpet one listing | ₹11,060 per super sq ft ≈ ₹17,015 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹17,188a modelled rate card | ₹23,649a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹67.00 L – ₹2.36 Cr | ₹1.31 Cr – ₹1.42 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹1.01 Cr – ₹1.99 Cr 1,370–2,350 sq ft super ≈ 890–1,528 sq ft carpet | ₹1.42 Cr 1,300 sq ft super ≈ 845 sq ft carpet |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹2,949 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | Level with it within ₹500 of the median of 10 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Raheja Navodaya | Wal Pravah Senior Living | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2016-01 as listed | Newlaunch possession stated as 2031-09 as listed |
The building and the developer
| Raheja Navodaya | Wal Pravah Senior Living | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Raheja Developers 8 projects we track, 26 town-planning licences, 14 refused applications tcp rolls | Wal Developments 3 projects we track, 2 town-planning licences tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | 480 homes across 4 towers as listed |
| Amenities | 34 counted 24 of them premium as listed | 4 countedas listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 16.4 kmstraight-line | 16.0 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Raheja Navodaya
On Wal Pravah Senior Living
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two