Sector 69, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Tulip Purple | Tulip Violet | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹11,583 per super sq ft ≈ ₹17,821 per carpet one listing | ₹15,465 per super sq ft ≈ ₹23,792 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹24,559a modelled rate card | ₹31,306a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹2.78 Cr – ₹2.78 Cr | ₹2.44 Cr – ₹4.88 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹2.78 Cr 2,400 sq ft super ≈ 1,560 sq ft carpet 1 listed | ₹3.11 Cr – ₹4.88 Cr 2,010–3,156 sq ft super ≈ 1,306–2,051 sq ft carpet 4 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹1,291 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹1,539 below the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Tulip Purple | Tulip Violet | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-154-2019hrera register | RERA-GRG-1939-2025hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 30/12/2023flagged lapsed | 30/12/2032registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2023-12 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2016-04 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | 0% of 224 units booked filed 2019-01-12 form rep-i | not on record |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| Tulip Purple | Tulip Violet | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Tulip Infratech 13 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences, 5 refused applications tcp rolls | Tulip Infratech 13 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences, 5 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 14 counted 7 of them premium as listed | 37 counted 26 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 9.2 kmnamed station | 9.4 kmnamed station |
| Resale outlook | Hard to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two