Sector 102, Gurugram

BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens vs HCBS Twin Horizon

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens

BPTP Limited

₹3.47 Cr

The full report on this one →

HCBS Twin Horizon

HCBS PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

₹4.83 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 102; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 3 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹3.47 Cr–₹5.16 Cr and ₹4.83 Cr–₹6.74 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens	HCBS Twin Horizon
Asking rate	₹20,988 per super sq ft ≈ ₹32,289 per carpet one listing	₹17,733 per super sq ft ≈ ₹27,282 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹40,908a modelled rate card	₹35,251a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹3.47 Cr – ₹5.16 Cr	₹4.83 Cr – ₹6.74 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 3 BHK here	₹3.90 Cr – ₹5.16 Cr 1,622–2,459 sq ft super ≈ 1,054–1,598 sq ft carpet 3 listed	₹4.83 Cr – ₹5.32 Cr 2,725–3,000 sq ft super ≈ 1,771–1,950 sq ft carpet 2 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹3,978 above the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort	₹723 above the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens	HCBS Twin Horizon
Registration	RERA-GRG-1830-2024hrera register	RERA-GRG-1888-2025hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	14/12/2031registration up-to	15/10/2028registration up-to
Stage and possession	Under Construction possession stated as 2032-06 as listed	Under Construction possession stated as 2028-10 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens	HCBS Twin Horizon
Developer	BPTP Limited 17 projects we track our corpus	HCBS PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED 3 projects we track, 1 town-planning licences tcp rolls
Size	not on record	not on record
Amenities	29 counted 19 of them premium as listed	50 counted 37 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	9.4 kmstraight-line	9.9 kmstraight-line
Resale outlook	Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index	Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens asks 18% more per square foot than HCBS Twin Horizon — ₹20,988 against ₹17,733, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹5,656 a carpet square foot, against ₹3,255 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
✓
Possession is stated as 2032-06 for BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens and 2028-10 for HCBS Twin Horizon
as listed by the developer
⚠
HCBS Twin Horizon lists 50 amenities against 29 at BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens. It is a count of what is advertised, and nobody audits it
developer listings
⚠
Our resale index reads BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens as slower to resell and HCBS Twin Horizon as mixed resale market. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On BPTP Amstoria Verti Greens

A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.