Sector 48, Gurugram

Central Park Resorts vs Vipul Greens

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

Central Park Resorts

Central Park

₹3.75 Cr

The full report on this one →

Vipul Greens

Vipul Group Builders

₹2.80 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 48; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 4 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹3.75 Cr–₹11.41 Cr and ₹2.80 Cr–₹6.24 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	Central Park Resorts	Vipul Greens
Asking rate	₹29,882 per super sq ft ≈ ₹45,973 per carpet one listing	₹18,282 per super sq ft ≈ ₹28,126 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹56,371a modelled rate card	₹36,205a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹3.75 Cr – ₹11.41 Cr	₹2.80 Cr – ₹6.24 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 4 BHK here	₹11.35 Cr – ₹11.41 Cr 3,800–3,820 sq ft super ≈ 2,470–2,483 sq ft carpet 2 listed	₹3.50 Cr – ₹5.50 Cr 2,170–2,846 sq ft super ≈ 1,410–1,850 sq ft carpet
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹622 above the median of 25 comparable homes our cohort	₹1,278 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	Central Park Resorts	Vipul Greens
Registration	RERA-GRG-330-2019hrera register	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	28/02/2026 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record	not on record
Stage and possession	Ready To Move possession stated as 2016-03 as listed	Ready To Move possession stated as 2013-07 as listed

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	Central Park Resorts	Vipul Greens
Developer	Central Park 18 projects we track our corpus	Vipul Group Builders 5 projects we track, 12 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls
Size	not on record	not on record
Amenities	23 counted 14 of them premium as listed	39 counted 28 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	7.4 kmnamed station	7.4 kmnamed station
Resale outlook	Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index	Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
Central Park Resorts asks 63% more per square foot than Vipul Greens — ₹29,882 against ₹18,282, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹20,166 a carpet square foot, against ₹11,600 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
✓
Possession is stated as 2016-03 for Central Park Resorts and 2013-07 for Vipul Greens
as listed by the developer
⚠
Central Park Resorts is matched to the Haryana RERA register; Vipul Greens is not. A project can be registered under a legal name that differs from its marketing name, so treat this as an open question on Vipul Greens rather than a finding
HRERA register
⚠
Vipul Greens lists 39 amenities against 23 at Central Park Resorts. It is a count of what is advertised, and nobody audits it
developer listings

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On Central Park Resorts

A town-planning licence record we could match to this developer

not on record

On Vipul Greens

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.