Sector 48, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Central Park Resorts | One Group The Saavira | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹29,882 per super sq ft ≈ ₹45,973 per carpet one listing | ₹18,497 per super sq ft ≈ ₹28,456 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹56,371a modelled rate card | ₹36,578a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹3.75 Cr – ₹11.41 Cr | ₹4.60 Cr – ₹6.21 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹11.35 Cr – ₹11.41 Cr 3,800–3,820 sq ft super ≈ 2,470–2,483 sq ft carpet 2 listed | ₹6.21 Cr 3,360 sq ft super ≈ 2,184 sq ft carpet |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹622 above the median of 25 comparable homes our cohort | ₹1,486 above the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Central Park Resorts | One Group The Saavira | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-330-2019hrera register | RERA-GRG-1744-2024hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 28/02/2026 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | 31/12/2031registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2016-03 as listed | Newlaunch possession stated as 2029-07 as listed |
The building and the developer
| Central Park Resorts | One Group The Saavira | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Central Park 18 projects we track our corpus | One Group 1 projects we track our corpus |
| Size | not on record | 72 homes across 1 towers as listed |
| Amenities | 23 counted 14 of them premium as listed | not on record |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 7.4 kmnamed station | 6.0 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Easy to resell how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Central Park Resorts
On One Group The Saavira
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two