Sector 99, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Cosmos Express 99 | Lotus Elise | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹9,649 per super sq ft ≈ ₹14,845 per carpet one listing | ₹10,977 per super sq ft ≈ ₹16,887 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹21,196a modelled rate card | ₹23,504a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹76.73 L – ₹2.63 Cr | ₹1.45 Cr – ₹3.32 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹2.27 Cr – ₹2.63 Cr 2,350–2,730 sq ft super ≈ 1,528–1,774 sq ft carpet 2 listed | ₹3.32 Cr 2,800 sq ft super ≈ 1,820 sq ft carpet |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹643 below the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹685 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Cosmos Express 99 | Lotus Elise | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-276-2019hrera register | RERA-GRG-314-2019hrera register |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 31/03/2025 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | 30/09/2021 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2017-10 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2021-09 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | their own filed completion date has moved back 48 months filed 2019-07-30 form rep-i | 73% of 158 units booked their own filed completion date has moved back 38 months filed 2019-10-10 form rep-i |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| Cosmos Express 99 | Lotus Elise | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cosmos Infra Engineering 2 projects we track, 1 refused applications our corpus | Lotus Realtech Builders 2 projects we track, 1 town-planning licences tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 29 counted 19 of them premium as listed | 13 counted 7 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 10.9 kmstraight-line | 11.1 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Cosmos Express 99
On Lotus Elise
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two