Sector 65, Gurugram

Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors vs M3M Latitude

We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.

Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors

Emaar India

₹2.50 Cr

The full report on this one →

M3M Latitude

M3M India

₹4.65 Cr

The full report on this one →

Why these two are on one page. A comparison only exists here where a buyer could genuinely be choosing between the two: both in Sector 65; both quoted on super area, so the rates compare directly; both sell a 3 BHK; their asking ranges overlap — ₹2.50 Cr–₹6.01 Cr and ₹4.65 Cr–₹6.40 Cr. All four are facts the projects state about themselves — we did not score their similarity.

What each one costs

The money, side by side

Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.

	Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors	M3M Latitude
Asking rate	₹19,085 per super sq ft ≈ ₹29,361 per carpet one listing	₹24,410 per super sq ft ≈ ₹37,553 per carpet one listing
Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together.
All-in, per carpet sq ft	₹37,599a modelled rate card	₹46,857a modelled rate card
The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them.
Ticket, as published	₹2.50 Cr – ₹6.01 Cr	₹4.65 Cr – ₹6.40 Cr
These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other.
A 3 BHK here	₹2.50 Cr 1,310–1,800 sq ft super ≈ 852–1,170 sq ft carpet 9 listed	₹4.65 Cr – ₹6.40 Cr 1,865–1,894 sq ft super ≈ 1,212–1,231 sq ft carpet 2 listed
The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us.
Against comparable homes	₹2,080 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort	₹7,405 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort
Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle.

What the public record holds

Registration and delivery

	Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors	M3M Latitude
Registration	No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found	RERA-GRG-602-2020hrera register
A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is.
Registered until	not on record	31/01/2023 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record
Stage and possession	Ready To Moveas listed	Ready To Move possession stated as 2023-01 as listed
What the developer told the regulator	not on record	68% of 160 units booked filed 2020-02-12 form rep-i
Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other.

The building and the developer

What stands behind each one

	Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors	M3M Latitude
Developer	Emaar India 31 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences tcp rolls	M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls
Size	not on record	not on record
Amenities	23 counted 17 of them premium as listed	27 counted 19 of them premium as listed
A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth.
Nearest metro	5.4 kmstraight-line	6.6 kmnamed station
Resale outlook	Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index	Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index
Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings.

The short version

Where they genuinely differ

Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.

✓
M3M Latitude asks 28% more per square foot than Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors — ₹24,410 against ₹19,085, both on super built-up area
both projects’ published rates
✓
Once charges and duty are added the gap becomes ₹9,257 a carpet square foot, against ₹5,325 on the quoted rate
published statutory rates, applied to both
⚠
M3M Latitude is matched to the Haryana RERA register; Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors is not. A project can be registered under a legal name that differs from its marketing name, so treat this as an open question on Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors rather than a finding
HRERA register
✓
M3M Latitude has filed how much of it was sold — 68% of 160 units when it last filed, in 2020-02. The other has not filed a figure we could read
Form REP-I
✓
Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors is 1.2 km closer to a metro station (5.4 km against 6.6 km)
mapped station locations
⚠
Our resale index reads Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors as good resale market and M3M Latitude as mixed resale market. It is our own index rather than a filed figure, and it describes how contested selling again would be, and says nothing about what the home will be worth
our resale index

Not compared

Where the record is incomplete

These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.

On Emaar Mgf Emerald Floors

A registration we can confidently attach to this project; a limit of our matching rather than a statement about the developer

not on record

The part you were expecting

We are not going to pick one

There is no winner on this page, and there will not be one. Two homes differ on price, on stage, on who built them and on how hard each would be to sell again, and which of those matters is a question about you rather than about the buildings. A site that ranks two homes is selling one of them. The most useful thing we can do is put the record of both in front of you and be clear about where it runs out.

Deciding between more than two? The Property File keeps your own shortlist, your own notes from each visit, and the all-in cost of each — and it does not pick a winner either.