Sector 65, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| M3M Latitude | M3M Polo Suites | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹24,410 per super sq ft ≈ ₹37,553 per carpet one listing | ₹12,469 per super sq ft ≈ ₹19,183 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹46,857a modelled rate card | ₹26,098a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹4.65 Cr – ₹6.40 Cr | ₹5.00 Cr – ₹5.00 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 3 BHK here | ₹4.65 Cr – ₹6.40 Cr 1,865–1,894 sq ft super ≈ 1,212–1,231 sq ft carpet 2 listed | ₹5.00 Cr 4,010 sq ft super ≈ 2,606 sq ft carpet 1 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹7,405 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort | ₹2,177 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| M3M Latitude | M3M Polo Suites | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | RERA-GRG-602-2020hrera register | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | 31/01/2023 past its end date, and HRERA does not flag it lapsed — the register disagrees with itself contradiction on record | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2023-01 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2019-06 as listed |
| What the developer told the regulator | 68% of 160 units booked filed 2020-02-12 form rep-i | not on record |
| Form REP-I is the developer’s own declaration to Haryana RERA. Where only one of the two has filed, that asymmetry is the finding. It is no mark against the other. | ||
The building and the developer
| M3M Latitude | M3M Polo Suites | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls | M3M India 40 projects we track, 5 town-planning licences, 8 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 27 counted 19 of them premium as listed | 27 counted 20 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 6.6 kmnamed station | 5.4 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On M3M Polo Suites
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two