Sector 49, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Orchid Petals | Vatika City | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹17,467 per super sq ft ≈ ₹26,873 per carpet one listing | ₹20,022 per super sq ft ≈ ₹30,803 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹34,788a modelled rate card | ₹39,229a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹2.80 Cr – ₹5.50 Cr | ₹2.72 Cr – ₹6.00 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹4.90 Cr – ₹5.50 Cr 1,800–2,858 sq ft super ≈ 1,170–1,858 sq ft carpet | ₹5.32 Cr – ₹6.00 Cr 2,660–2,999 sq ft super ≈ 1,729–1,949 sq ft carpet 2 listed |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | Level with it within ₹500 of the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort | ₹3,017 above the median of 104 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Orchid Petals | Vatika City | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | not on record |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2007-05 as listed | Ready To Move possession stated as 2012-06 as listed |
The building and the developer
| Orchid Petals | Vatika City | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Orchid Infrastructure Developers 1 projects we track, 1 town-planning licences tcp rolls | Vatika Group 20 projects we track, 26 town-planning licences, 7 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | not on record |
| Amenities | 30 counted 19 of them premium as listed | 27 counted 19 of them premium as listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 5.8 kmstraight-line | 6.5 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Easy to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Good resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Orchid Petals
On Vatika City
The part you were expecting
Keep going


Other comparisons with these two