Sector 70, Gurugram
We do not pick one. Below is what each states about itself, what we could check against a public record, and, named rather than left blank, what neither of us can answer.


What each one costs
Every figure below is published by the project or computed the same way its own page computes it. Nothing is averaged, and a disagreement between sources renders as a range.
| Tulip Ivory | Vardhman Samisha Ambrosia | |
|---|---|---|
| Asking rate | ₹11,875 per super sq ft ≈ ₹18,269 per carpet one listing | ₹13,688 per super sq ft ≈ ₹21,058 per carpet one listing |
| Both quoted on the same area basis — that is one of the reasons these two are on a page together. | ||
| All-in, per carpet sq ft | ₹25,066a modelled rate card | ₹28,217a modelled rate card |
| The quoted rate plus development charges, GST, stamp duty and registration, divided back over carpet area. Same calculation as each project’s own page — statutory rates are published, development charges are marked where we had to model them. | ||
| Ticket, as published | ₹2.85 Cr – ₹5.60 Cr | ₹3.73 Cr – ₹4.18 Cr |
| These overlap. That is the test that put the two on one page: a budget that reaches one reaches the other. | ||
| A 4 BHK here | ₹2.85 Cr – ₹3.50 Cr 2,400 sq ft super ≈ 1,560 sq ft carpet | 2,880 sq ft super ≈ 1,872 sq ft carpet |
| The configuration both projects list most of, priced as each publishes it. Nothing is converted or estimated by us. | ||
| Against comparable homes | ₹1,583 above the median of 89 comparable homes our cohort | ₹3,322 below the median of 41 comparable homes our cohort |
| Not against each other — against every home we hold on the same area basis, price tier and lifecycle. | ||
What the public record holds
| Tulip Ivory | Vardhman Samisha Ambrosia | |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | No match found may be registered under a different legal name no match found | RERA-GRG-1570-2024 matched on name similarity; unconfirmed unconfirmed match |
| A registration we cannot confidently attach is a limit of our matching and says nothing about the project. We say which it is. | ||
| Registered until | not on record | 31/12/2030registration up-to |
| Stage and possession | Ready To Move possession stated as 2014-03 as listed | Underconstruction possession stated as 2030-01 as listed |
The building and the developer
| Tulip Ivory | Vardhman Samisha Ambrosia | |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Tulip Infratech 13 projects we track, 7 town-planning licences, 5 refused applications tcp rolls | Shree Vardhman 5 projects we track, 2 town-planning licences, 1 refused applications tcp rolls |
| Size | not on record | 228 homes across 2 towers as listed |
| Amenities | 32 counted 23 of them premium as listed | 8 countedas listed |
| A count of what is listed. It says nothing about what any of it is worth. | ||
| Nearest metro | 12.6 kmnamed station | 8.5 kmstraight-line |
| Resale outlook | Slower to resell how contested selling it again would be our index | Mixed resale market how contested selling it again would be our index |
| Our own index, filed nowhere: built from liquidity, pipeline, price position and location, and validated against resale listings. | ||
The short version
Each line names the figure it came from. None of them is advice.
Not compared
These fields are missing for one or both projects, so no comparison is drawn. Named here rather than left blank, where an absence would read as a finding.
On Tulip Ivory
On Vardhman Samisha Ambrosia
The part you were expecting
Keep going